Friday, April 17, 2020

Won't Get Fooled Again?


Greetings and salutations from your locked-down Bubbe, who is—by every imaginable standard—ready for change.

Evidently, I’m not the only person who feels that way. I recently found out about the unique and inventive “2020 Card for Change.” It is reminiscent of the style of the American Mah Jongg Association (AMJA), with a very different feel from our annual National Mah Jongg League (NMJL) card. For those of you who are unfamiliar with the AMJA, its rules are similar to NMJL: they both use a card that lists specific hands, with assigned values; no one can use a joker to complete a pair; and some hands are concealed, versus exposed. However, a big difference between them is that AMJA hands can include both words and numeric patterns. 

How do you make mah jongg tiles into words? Obviously, we are used to seeing “NEWS” representing the four Winds, as well as “F” for Flower, “G a green dragon, “R a red dragon, and “0” (zero) a soap/white dragon. AMJL card designers go further. For example, they use a “7” to depict the letter “L”, and a “1” for the letter “I”—and the soap can be used as either that zero or the letter “O”. 

Having seen this convention, I was familiar with the words vs. numbers idea...but the 2020 Card for Change is special for more than just using words, per se. The meanings of most of the hands reflect the theme of the card which is, like its designers Deb Love and Lisa Gelber, unabashedly partisan. There are names of political figures from both parties (McConnell; Obama, Pelosi, Schiff), and phrases that reinforce Democratic goals and values. For instance, there is a hand that reads:

DEMS 444 AMERICA

This would be represented by any Dragon, an East, a West (upside down!) and a South; a pung of 4’s in any suit; Any tile, another upside-down West, an East, a Red dragon, a 1 in any suit, any number tile as long as it’s a Crak, and Any tile. Technically, it’s an exposed hand, but the only part you could call for exposure would be the pung of 4’s. 

Only clever minds could come up with so intricate a card. They have reimagined sections that we traditionally expect from the NMJL, with titles like “CAN’T EVEN” (2468), “ODD MEN OUT” (13579), “THREE’S NOT A CROWD” (369), “NO MORE OF THE SAME, PLEASE” (Like Numbers), and “RUN FOR SOMETHING” (Consecutive Runs). There are also categories of “DEM HEROES,” “DEM VALUES,” and the purely election-related “VOTE FOR DEMS.”

The 2020 Card for Change uses a lot of political slogans and icons, but there are some more traditional NMJL-type hands. All of the combinations in the “20 IS OUR LUCKY NUMBER” section include kongs of three numbers that add up to 20. No Flowers are required; just a kong of 9’s plus two other kongs that add to 11 (3+8, 4+7, 5+6), in either one suit or three. Obviously, this is a year when “2” tiles are at a premium, so 11+9 was a good way to utilize the other numbers.

Strangely, and purely by coincidence, several hands are identical to the 2020 NMJL card. Since Deb and Lisa’s card came out in February, there is no way that they “copied” these hands. The happy result is that some players may find comfort seeing a few familiar ways to use their tiles.

On the other hand, experimenting with the unfamiliar is the whole point of using a non-traditional card. If and when you and your friends get in a rut (what, it’s only mid-April?!)—or if you are sympathetic to Democratic causes—it’s worth taking a look! 

The card is available by contacting mahjongsocialclub@gmail.com or finding the Mah Jong Social Club page on Facebook. While there is no actual “price” for the card, Deb and Lisa ask that you consider making a donation to the Democratic/Progressive organization of your choice. They provide some suggestions including the ACLU, Democratic National Committee, Planned Parenthood, Emily’s List, Fair Fight, and MoveOn.org.



Another great thing to remember during this time of social distancing/quarantine is that the 2020 Card for Change, like several other alternative cards, can be used on some online versions of mahj. If four friends play together on myjongg.net, they can select the “bring your own card” option. Deb has been asking the designer at Realmahjongg.com to allow the same opportunity; if you’re a Realmahjongg user and would like to be able to use non-traditional cards, join this grassroots effort and try to convince Ronnie, the designer, to add such a feature.

When I learned about the 2020 Card for Change, I found the whole concept so interesting—from designing an original and passionately partisan group of hands, to encouraging contributions to left-leaning organizations—that I contacted Deb and asked her if she would grant me an interview. Luckily, she said yes—my next column will spotlight her passion for mah jongg, political activism, philanthropy, and a few other creative “lives” that she has led.

If you have any questions or comments about Deb and Lisa’s card, or just want to check in with me, I’m always happy to hear from you—email me at bubbefischer@gmail.com

Talk to you soon!

Bubbe

Friday, April 3, 2020

Ambiguous Exposures

Greetings and salutations from Bubbe, who has been tied up with chores over the past few days. Lately I have had a lot more dishes to wash...funny how that happens.

I wanted to follow up on the Quiz I ran last week. I had asked, "Try and find these two exposures in at least one hand on the card".

7777 888 appears only once, in the 4th Consecutive Run hand ("CR4").

444 5555 could be CR 1, CR 4, or CR 6!

222 3333 would be CR 3

3333 3333 could be LN1, LN 2, or the second hand in 369 

5555 7777 could be CR 2 (b) or 13579 2 (b) hand

555 777 was a trick question--it doesn't appear on the 2020 card!!


Christine Blackford emailed me her answers, she got 100% on the little quiz--nice going, Christine!

This fits in with one of my favorite topics, Ambiguous Exposures. If you got to hear me on Fern Bernstein's podcast, you heard me talk about Ambiguous Exposures a lot. What I mean is that sometimes one, two (or even three!) exposures could refer to two (or more) hands. 
The concept is a little different than having a backup hand. I'll discuss that in more detail in a future article. Ambiguous exposures could be used defensively: recognizing what possibilities your opponent might be playing, based on their exposures. You can also use ambiguous exposures to your own advantage, if opponents don't know what you are playing. For instance, if the tiles you need for your original hand are no longer available, you may still have a second (or third) hand to point to, if anyone questions whether your hand is dead.

One example I used in the podcast was based on the LN #1 and #2 hands: each includes two kongs of the same number. No one would know from exposing kongs of, say, 7 bams and 7 craks, whether you were going to need that third kong (four 7 dots) or pairs of the green and red dragons. There are additional potential ambiguities, based on the number exposed: if there are two kongs of 2's, you might also be playing the first 2020 hand. If there are two kongs of 3's, you might be playing the second hand in 369.

Another example I used was based on the fifth "quiz" question, above. There is an interesting feature of the second, tri-suited version of CR2, with two kongs of different suits in two "skipped" consecutive numbers, e.g. kong of 1 crak and kong of 3 bam, with a kong of Flowers and a pair of 2 dots in the middle. This year's card has tri-suited "multiplication" hands in the Even (2468) and Odd (13579) sections, and there's ambiguity with all THREE exposures compared with CR2(b): four Flowers and then kongs of 4 and 6 in different suits; 6 and 8 in different suits; 3 and 5 in different suits; and 5 and 7 in different suits. The last two tiles could be "24," "48," "15," and "35," respectively, in the third suit...OR they could be the middle "pair" (55, 77, 44, or 66) in the third suit.

A third example was how both the first and fourth 369 hands involve a pung of 6s in one suit and a kong of 9s in a second suit.

The advantage with each of these "ambiguous hands" is that you avoid being called dead. In the Like Numbers example, if three dragons go out in one of the suits you need, you can avoid being called dead because it's possible that you are going for the third like numbered kong. In the CR2(b)/ multiplication example, if the pair in the middle is no longer available, you can try for the "product" numbers, or vice versa. The 369 example is even better, because if you were going for hand #4, involving two pairs of 3's but they were unavailable, you can say you were going for the non-pairs 369 hand (369 #1)--and that hand NEVER goes dead!

Try looking the card over and seeing if there are other examples, I'm sure you'll find some!

I always enjoy hearing from you--feel free to contact me at bubbefischer@gmail.com

 
Talk to you soon!

Bubbe Fischer



Monday, March 30, 2020

Bubbe Speaks!!


Greetings and salutations from your loquacious Bubbe!

Sure, you've been reading my words of wisdom all these weeks, or months, or maybe some of you have been following me for years. But finally….Bubbe speaks!

My friend Fern Bernstein has a podcast that started from her book, Mah Jongg Mondays. She invited me to come on and talk about the new card, specifically picking one hand per section to discuss. Frankly, I am amazed she got me to STOP talking.

Some of my friends say that reading my books is like listening to me talk, that I basically write exactly as I speak. Now you'll get to hear for real, that yes, this is how I talk. I could wax rhapsodic about mah jongg all day long. So if you've got 45 minutes or so, click on the link below and give it a listen. You will hear me citing some of my most famous Bubbe-isms, and you might pick up a few new things as well:



As always, if you have any comments or questions, you can email me at bubbefischer@gmail.com

Talk to you soon!

Bubbe Fischer

PS: Fern has asked me to come back for another podcast, and if you have a particularly good question, I may include it as part of the Q&A in that show.

Friday, March 27, 2020

Legally Mahj


Greetings and salutations from Bubbe, whose little gerbil mind is running on the wheel again today!

One of the other columns I write for each new card, in an effort to be helpful, is identify illegal exposures for "exposed"/open hands. I recommend that you become familiar with them so that you won't make a mistake and have your hand called dead.

There's an ongoing controversy about this. Some mahj players feel that it's "rude" to call another player's hand dead. I don't think anybody needs to take it so personally. There's no way a person can win if their hand is dead, and the other players will now be able to see 33% more tiles. On the other hand, there are certain times when it might be to your advantage NOT to call another player's hand dead, because your hand is terrible and you want to restrict the number of picks that everyone else at the table gets. Long story. Back to the new card…

Single exposures in 2020, YAY or NAY?

       PUNGS: an exposure of three Flowers, dragons, North, or South is illegal. A pung of East, West, or any number is legal.
       KONGS: ANY exposure is legal.
       QUINTS: an exposure of five Winds or dragons is illegal. A quint of any number or Flowers is legal.

Second exposures:

       A quint of Flowers could be joined by a kong of dragons, or a pung, kong or quint of a number. No Winds.
       A kong of Flowers could be joined by a kong of any number, or a pung of any number EXCEPT 9's. No dragons or Winds
       A kong of dragons may be joined by a quint of Flowers or any number; a second kong of dragons or a kong of any number; or a pung of East, West, or any number.
And by the way....
       A kong of North will have a matching kong of South (same with East and West).
       A pung of East will have a matching pung of West.



Exposing numbers gets a little more complicated. Rather than explain each legal and illegal combination, I will just remind you to review the card closely. As a quick quiz, try and find these two exposures in at least one hand on the card:


7777 888

444 5555

222 3333

3333 3333

5555 7777

555 777

If you have any questions or comments, you can email me at bubbefischer@gmail.com . I am always happy to hear from you!

One such correspondent earned a special shout-out. Azimeh Roshan pointed out an error in the description of the third Singles and Pairs hand: it should say any TWO consecutive pairs. Great job!

I know I'll talk to you all VERY soon.

Bubbe Fischer